CloudTags: battery , battery life , laptops,laptop batteries , Samsung NC 10
Tablets and Ultrabooks are on the rise and Windows-on-ARM (WOA) tablets are on the horizon. For Windows 8 to succeed in today’s — and tomorrow’s — market for both low- and high-powered portable devices, Microsoft needed to get rid of its “fat” Windows without losing functionality. The goal was to not just increase responsiveness, but also to improve battery life, which is obviously one of the core criteria for everyone shopping for a new laptop or tablet. How does Windows 8 fare? We’ve got answers”:
Microsoft’s promise: Less energy consumption
Redmond pushed out almost a dozen blog posts that either demonstrate their battery life/power consumption improvements or show off how new their new features (e.g. USB 3.0 support, Connected Standby, Live Tiles, Metro Apps) are built with saving power in mind.
Here are the highlights:
- All background Metro-style apps will be suspended; only the foreground app consumes resources and thus battery life. If an app is not on screen and actively used, it shouldn’t drain battery. Only a set of apps will be allowed to use background activity (e.g. for music playback or printing).
- Improved idle usage of the OS.
- On-system drivers, such as the USB host controllers and keyboard drivers, put the device into low-powered modes sooner.
- Memory deduplication mechanisms to reduce RAM workload.
Battery life benchmark: Windows 8 consumer preview
“We think of power as a critical system resource, just like CPU utilization, hard disk activity, or memory consumption.” explains Pat Stemen, a Program Manager on the Windows Kernel team, on the B8 blog.
So how power-friendly is the new Windows exactly? We wanted to put Windows 8 CP up for a test run on a variety of laptops and see how it stacks up against Windows 7 SP1. Here’s the hardware I used:
Laptop A — Acer Aspire 7551G. A Run of the mill 17-inch laptop with a Phenom II X4 CPU and 4 GB of RAM. Good for multimedia, but not particularly well-suited in the battery life department.
Lapotp B — Samsung NC 10. One of the better 2008-era netbooks. The usual yada-yada specs (Atom N270 1.6 GHz, 1 GB RAM). Low performance, extremely good battery life.
Laptop C — 13″ MacBook Air (2011) equipped with a 1.8 GHz Core i7, 4 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD drive.
* I didn’t test on an ultrabook, but the MacBook Air running Windows matches the most current ultrabooks in terms of specs, battery power and form factor.
All three represent very different laptops, targeted at very different audiences. Evaluating these devices should give a good glimpse of what to expect on the battery life front.
Test scenario
I used PCMark 7′s “Lightweight” test, which simulates typical workloads such as adding music to Media Player, browsing the web, copying files and scanning for malware while leaving a couple of seconds of idle time in between. I looped the test until the battery of the device ran dry. Second, I just let the laptop sit there, do nothing and just “die”. While that’s not a particular realistic scenario, it demonstrates idle usage which is very important for battery life: Remember, you’re not constantly pushing your CPU to its limit — while you’re reading something, sitting in a meeting or just waiting in between presentation slides, your laptop needs to go into idle as fast as possible and stay there until you do something. It is a good basis for judging power management.
Since third party software usually impacts battery life, I installed only the very basic programs such as Office 2010, TeamViewer, SnagIT, Adobe Reader and Flash on both machines. In all cases, I used the “Balanced” power saver mode and cranked up brightness to about 50-70%, while leaving Wi-Fi on.
Results
I repeated each test run exactly three times to avoid discrepancies. In each and every case I got pretty much same results (+/- 5 minutes). Results are measured in minutes:
Microsoft has done its homework. Idle performance of Windows 8 seems to best that of Windows 7 SP1 in every case. This is especially true on the MacBook Air: Here, idle battery life increased by 51 minutes. Even under the PCMark 7 workload, it managed to squeeze 24 minutes of additional battery life out of the machine. Our trusty old Samsung NC 10 ran for 40 more minutes in “idle” while it gave me another 20 minutes under typical workload. While that’s not a lot, it may just mean the difference between wrapping up a movie or work on an airplane and having to stare at a blank screen for the rest of the flight.
Overall: While there are no major leaps, these are all solid improvements across the board.












The Gateway NV55S05u is one of the first laptops to use AMD’s new Llano-based parts, and it performed ably and is priced to move.
The HP Pavilion dv6-6135dx desktop replacement laptop delivers above-average graphics for a budget laptop, but is a subpar performer on productivity and multimedia tasks.
Underneath its ugly-duckling exterior, however, is a compilation of fast-running parts that include a Core i5 processor and switching graphics technology (good for preserving battery life), courtesy of Nvidia’s GeForce GT 520M graphics chip.
High style, strong performance, and big sound highlight the versatile HP Pavilion dv6-6173cl, a 15.6-inch desktop replacement that would be good for your home.
The HP Pavilion dv7-6163cl supplies quad-core performance, switchable graphics, booming audio, and a sleek aluminum chassis at a fair price, making it the affordable media center laptop to beat.
The Acer AS3830TG-6431 is one of the most powerful ultraportables on the market, even though it’s far from being the lightest.
The XPS 15z (Microsoft) is available from Microsoft’s Store and every bit as luxurious as the Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch, but it won’t cost you nearly as much.
The Toshiba Satellite P755-S5269 desktop replacement laptop offers high-end processing and gaming-level graphics without going overboard on price.
Hot on the heels of the announcement of new ThinkPad corporate laptops for 2012, Lenovo is showcasing its coming consumer lineup, which sells under the IdeaPad brand. At first glance, these don’t appear to be dramatic changes from the existing lineup. With the IdeaPad U300s Ultrabook just recently released, it’s probably too much to expect dramatic changes in the short term.
Shipping in May are the new IdeaPad U310 and U410 Ultrabooks. They’re similar in appearance to the U300s we previously reviewed, with a few tweaks. Gone is the SSD, replaced by a standard hard drive with solid state cache. The 14-inch U410 features discrete Nvidia GeForce 610M graphics, while the smaller 13.3-inch U310 relies on Intel’s integrated graphics. Though they are thin, they’re a little on the heavy side by Ultrabook standards. The U310 weighs 3.74 pounds, while the U410 weighs 4.18 pounds. Fortunately, they’re less expensive as well, with a starting price of $699.
Tablets and smartphones are in, but don’t count laptops out. Impressive new laptops planned for 2012 promise to be thinner, lighter, and faster, as well as to carry longer-lasting batteries.
Thin and lightweight Ultrabooks are the watchword, thanks to Intel, which has trademarked the name for a new category of ultraportable laptops.
The second-generation Intel Core i5 and i7 CPUs in today’s laptops went by the code name Sandy Bridge. That platform’s successor is due next year. Ivy Bridge takes the Sandy Bridge architecture (with a few minor tweaks) and shrinks it down from a 32nm manufacturing process to Intel’s new22nm tri-gate process. It also dumps the Sandy Bridge graphics core in favor of a whole new graphics architecture that runs more quickly, provides better video acceleration, and supports Microsoft’s DirectX 11.
The new Start screen and Metro-style interface will be contentious, sparking a backlash among some longtime Windows users. Other users will love the fresh new look and feel. Most important, the operating system will undoubtedly inspire a major surge in PC purchases, and an enormous marketing push from Microsoft and its partners.




It was only a year ago when the iPad was considered a netbook killer—remember netbooks?—but now many people are wondering whether tablets are good enough to replace a full-fledged laptop. The answer is simple: maybe. It really depends on your computing needs. Here’s a quick breakdown of what you should consider before deciding to buy either type of device for yourself or as a gift.
Tablets are particularly attractive as gifts because they’re more affordable than most laptops. The iPad 2 starts at $499, and there are several slates that start as low as $199. We haven’t seen many quality devices at that lower price, but it looks like the $199Amazon Kindle Fire changes that with a great screen, a turbo-charged browser, and easy access to Amazon content. A good notebook costs $200 to $300 more.